Science advances, building upon a solid foundation of ancient knowledge,
as its practitioners are persuaded by compelling data to extent the edifice
of knowledge to encompass all that is knowable.
From observation, and experience we develop expectations and a perception of continuity and predictability. But when this all leads to unwarranted speculation and stereotyping perhaps we need to rethink our mode of "reasoning" and understanding of Truth.
Extinctions Not So Clear
The six blind men and the elephant.
So, how did we break out of the classical trap of relying upon our perceptions only to subsequently drop ourselves into a different trap that has enslaved us for the past 100 years? How did we become sequestered in this cul-de-sac of pseudo understanding designated by labels such as : The (fill in the blank) Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics?
The following is a heuristic approach to resolving this dilemma.
As illustrated in Section One : Whence We Came we developed a classical view of reality to compensate for our faulty perceptions and penchants for the simpleminded acceptance of the "obvious". Each of us has a unique perspective on the flow of events and it is doubtful we will ever fully agree upon the most important lessons to be learned from each "discovery".
Chaos Ensues : A 
presentation.
asymptotic behavior
Opened locally with TeXShop /Documents/CoursesOsherLLI/QuantumMechanics/EmergentMathConundrum/IterativeProcess.tex.
Poincaré and others (1880s) explored chaos long before Lorenz discovered (1961) one of the fundamental features of chaos, the Lorentz Attractor.
Dark Energy might not be a thing.
(06 JANUARY 2020) New evidence shows that the key assumption made in the discovery of dark energy is in error Journal information: Astrophysical Journal Early-Type Host Galaxies of Type Ia Supernovae. II. Evidence for Luminosity Evolution in Supernova Cosmology, Astrophysical Journal arxiv.org/abs/1912.04903 full 51 page PDF
I do not agree with Dr. Donald D. Hoffman -- but
The Evolutionary Argument Against RealityThe Early 1900s challenge: The "Dark Clouds on the Horizon" in the late 1800s were about how knowledge didn’t match reality. The developments of the early 1900s were about reconciling laboratory measurements with theory. The class emphasis will highlight the mistakes that are made by "modern philosophers" that adhere tenaciously to ancient truths and prejudices. The second segment of sessions will be an attempt to explore why, over tens of decades, we cling to our classical view of Reality.
Dr. Rodger Howe describes Conway's Game of Life, Like The Game of Eleusis, as a construct from the bottom up. But, I always used this from the top down because ......... highlight we do not have access !!! to the coding.
We ask questions concerning intentionality where intentionality does not, or in reality cannot, exist! We fail to ask questions concerning intentionality where intentionality is obviously, or demonstrable, present!
I will use The Game of Life (a robust computing environment) as an analogy to the real world to describe how we approached an understanding of Reality a little more than one hundred years ago. Starting with how Observations lead to inferring microscopic Processes guiding our construction of a Theory that then suggests how we might apprehend Reality. To truly apprehend Reality we must figure out how to understand Quantum Mechanics (a seemingly impossible task).
Gospers Glider Gun lifted from en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conway's_Game_of_Life.
Here is a global perspective summarizing Absolutely Everything you need to know about Quantum Mechanics.
Warning ! This summery (as with all such) is (··· perhaps too ···) cryptic: DoInfinitiesExist.pdf (see (What does it feel like to invent math?) for how infinite positive sum becomes negative) : Some additional reading that may be of some interest.
Put this at the very !!! end of section 02 !!!!!
Pair this with DoInfinitiesExist.pdf which is presently linked just under the Glider comment
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XFDM1ip5HdU
Session21.pdf We need a better way to express "no mechanism for transition from the probable to the actual". Perhaps the language of emergent processes. Should this be in html text or part of Beamer text. I am thinking the latter would work best. Also maybe not repeat the my vote analogy (Allusion). and re-watch A critique of educationalists by Jeff Bliss.